I realize that the "column"-size format doesn't permit much detail. Nevertheless, I'm puzzled by Medved's choices. It obviously depends what yardstick one uses to measure success, and Medved seems to put undue weight on political success. By focusing on political success he creates a bias toward getting reelected and (perhaps worse) "getting things done."
We need to stop the government from consuming our country and leaving it so weak it can't recover in 100 years, if ever. Obama is hell-bent on pursuing this destructive government strategy, so I vote for him as worst since FDR, and among the all-time worst.