PhdisReality Wrote:
Feb 02, 2013 1:10 PM
Sorry Fletch, your on the right path, but still wrong. He DOESN'T have to explicitly call for harassing calls. Intent under these types of statues are usually written into the law, using the context of the rest of the article, we can probably agree that random union guy is likely to get harassing calls, and that's pretty much where the bar is set. Ransom would have to argue that he didn't realize the article would cause harassing calls, and from the context of the rest of the article and the snarky tone, encouraging others to call, that would be difficult.