HeraldOfGalactus Wrote:
Feb 01, 2013 11:24 AM
It isn't about who gays CAN marry. It's about who gays WANT to marry. During the Loving vs. Virginia case in 1967 this same logic was used by opponents of inter-racial marriage. They claimed that the Lovings were free to marry an unmarried, unrelated, consenting adult of the opposite sex AND THE SAME RACE. But the court didn't agree with that logic. So how is your logic any different?