Bruceybaby Wrote:
Jan 31, 2013 11:19 AM
You're both wrong - the citizens were supposed to bear arms so that the country would not need to have the burden of a standing army - look it up. Also, the 2nd Amendment doesn't specify which arms you can or cannot have. But limits have been imposed (you can't have a shoulder-fired surface-to-air missile) that are reasonable, and the Supreme Court agrees with this. So the question is, what arms are reasonable to be in circulation?