I guess this article is a real big deal. My news feed featured about 15 different fawning, "journalists" on it's knees, regurgitating the interview as breaking news. Pathetic. But what struck me as more pathetic and alarming is the great Zero's repeated attempts to pivot the argument to hunting as in the 2nd amendment accounts for the allowing of the average lowly backwoodser to merely "hunt" using a gun. The all knowing, wisest of the wise believes it to be tradition so he can allow it. Isn't Zero supposed to be a constitutional expert? I can't find anything in the 2nd amendment that stupilates hunting. We have the right to bear arms PERIOD, regardless of what it's for.