Why do we on the Right always argue defensively ... i.e. from a position of weakness?
The right proclaimed early that "if one child's life were saved by increased gun control, then that justifies the additional control". That logic is flawed. Example ... Let's give them that maybe 100 children lives might be saved. Then let's ask if the additional controls cause a few thousand deaths of defenseless people (including children), would they still advocate for additional gun controls. When, as expected, the Lefties diss the notion of the increased deaths, we could/should simply say "prove it".
Let's put the monkey on their backs for a change. Let's remember that "offense is the best defense".