"Our constitution is a living document open to new interpretation by each new generation. What was acceptable in 1790 is not in 2013...' Really? Fail.. I suggest you study a little Constitutional Law, and not from the same places our dear Misleader did, where they specialize in Constitutional sabotage. Your statement shows just what is wrong with people's understanding of the Constitution. It anchors the scale of Constitutional interpretation on the Activist, Instrumentalist side, without even acknowledging that there IS a scale, or the legitimacy of the viewpoints of anyone on the Originalist/Formalist side (or the other possibilities in between). Typical of the arrogance of lieberals; if you don't see things my way, you don't exist.