stereotypo Wrote:
Jan 27, 2013 8:30 AM
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. If I understand the second amendment correctly, it is the infringement of the right to keep and bear arms that is the violation of the law. Why are you calling it "civil disobedience" to defend that right?