So, you criticize the gun control laws because they are targeting something that is not the cause of the mass murder incidents of recent years. Fine, that is fair. Gun control laws will not reduce the incidence of these events. I agree. But, then you suggest that we should institute involuntary commitment for the mentally ill by telling the story of a schizophrenic woman who never harmed anyone else? Not one of the gunmen in the recent mass murders was schizophrenic. Isn't your argument basically the same as your argument about bayonets and muskets? You are using a diagnosis that has nothing to do with the problem to try to justify another pointless 'solution'.