Harry343 Wrote:
Jan 23, 2013 10:49 AM
The more educated they are the more narrow and myopic their vision and the more emotionally invested they become. When you add the pursuit of grant money, the political agenda of the institutes of higher education, the professional power and prestige of controlling peer review, these "scientists" become corrupt and unable to be objective in applying the scientific method in the study of "global warming." It's all about money, prestige, and power.