Objection to gay marriage (as opposed to civil unions, which are already legal) is not homophobic, nor is it bigotry. The social consequences are far-reaching and worthy of consideration. Why isn't it possible to have a rational debate about it, without the name-calling and character assassination? Those are not arguments, but avoidance of the issue. Like many other self-important groups, gays want what they want when they want it, and to heck with the consequences. If someone objects, well then, they're just mean (and worse) -- end of discussion. It's childish.