So a converted skeptic now thinks he was wrong is the crux of the article. This counts as evidence. Why is it every time we get evidence of AGW it turns out to be forged, fudged or skewed? And why is it every time there is evidence that refutes AGW the proponents move the goal posts and claim it is not about global warming it is about climate change? Algore and his minions are no different than the rain men of the last century who promised wonderful results from the weather if people would just give them their money. The article does prove there is money to be made from switching sides too.