Yes, that is a well publicized situation. However, it is not customary in peer-reviewed journals to insist upon a retraction of the article from the publishing journal. What usually happens in a scholarly discussion in the journal that summarizes the dissent and the perceived flaws in the article. After the dissent is published, the original author is given the opportunity to respond to the dissenting opinion. That is how it is done in any reputable peer-reviewed journal I read. So how exactly does your post prove your point?