M1946W Wrote:
Jan 21, 2013 8:59 AM
The difference comes in Gleick's theft and attempt to decieve by forging documents versus simply releasing damning emails from the East Anglia crowd that did show attempts to not only suppress opinions differing from theirs but also discussing methods of manipulating data (e.g. hide the decline.) The 'investigations' in both cases were not a search for the truth but a mere rubber-stamp cover-up rather like a Democrat ethics investigation of one of their members who has been caught with their hand in the cookie jar.