muhl Wrote:
Jan 17, 2013 3:36 PM
My only objection to the Bill Of Rights is that Amendment Two SHOULD have been Amendment One, since the ENTIRE Bill Of Rights is totally WORTHLESS without the right to bear arms. "Rights" mean nothing without the FORCE necessary to defend them. Personally, I believe it should be a REQUIREMENT for EACH citizen to have, at minimum, a six-shot revolver within easy access to defend one's self. This requirement should be offset by government guarantee that any citizen who finds financial difficulty to be an obstacle, that obstacle MUST be surmounted by legal provision. There should be no citizen without armed protection.