bigdawgworking Wrote:
Jan 17, 2013 11:08 AM
Reframe the debate: Why do liberals leave children defenseless? The blood of those children is on their hands. And, the solution: fewer rounds in the gun? Outrageously stupid. All that means is that the children still die, but the shooter was inconvenienced. I challenge Obama to stand up and state that his goal is to inconvenience madmen, but NOT to defend children. What kind of monsters are these liberals?