Raven7 Wrote:
Jan 14, 2013 11:07 AM
Robert, and those of apparently similar leaning: Where do you stand on the contention of Giubilini and Minerva (Journal of Medical Ethics - look it up) that after-birth abortion (the term favored by them, rather than infanticide) should be allowed if the mother decides at that point that she does not want the baby? Where does it stop, and how do you justify any particular "milestone" for your decision?