Kenneth L. Wrote:
Jan 10, 2013 9:28 AM
And because the 2nd Amendment mentions as a rationale for the need of a right to keep and bear arms the maintenance of a "well-regulated militia," I guess you feel that the need for military-type firearms cannot be restricted although it's possible that handguns and sporting rifles/shotguns, etc. might be. I assume you feel you can make a logical argument, xj, since that's the basis of your objection to Ms Pavlich's point.