jthompson108 Wrote:
Dec 30, 2012 1:11 PM
"...but in reality the Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting." While I appreciate the article, Ms. Pavlich is mistaken that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting. According to a Supreme Court decision on June 26, 2008, "The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service with a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home." 'Traditionally lawful purposes' also include hunting, according to Justice Scalia.