Rob wrote: "Could you be specific about the vast conspiracy to suppress voting? If you're referring to the Republican insistence that people be required to, oh, prove they were eligible to vote, then if that resulted in a suppression of the vote, so be it. "
Well, I never called it a vast conspiracy, but I take your meaning. I can be specific. The voter ID law in PA did nothing to address voter eligibility. All those affected had already proved their eligibility by registering to vote. The law could only affect those who had already proven that to the state's satisfaction. Why would a legislature pass a law that could not p[possibly have the effect you posit? I suggest the key is in two statements made by Republicans. Cont'd