FremontChris Wrote:
Dec 27, 2012 3:43 PM
nimh2, So, I guess you'll provide us with the revisionist history. Not so fast... "Reviewing for The Independent Review, Professor Richard M. Gamble notes that The Real Lincoln "is seriously compromised by careless errors of fact, misuse of sources, and faulty documentation" which taken all together "constitute a near-fatal threat to DiLorenzo’s credibility as a historian." My bubble remains unburst at the moment.