Is there such a thing as neolibs? Please, conservatives are for the collective? This just doesn't make sense. Neocons sounds like one of those "cool" words that the radicals like to use a lot. Why do they always interpret the constitution to say what it doesn't? It's not freedom from religion, it's freedom of religion. It's freedom from the state sponsored mandatory religion. It's not that only the state should have arms, it's that citizens should have arms to defend itself against the state. Remember those old fashioned pre revolutionary war citizens that had to protect them selves against the king in the america our ancestors fought for many years ago. History anyone?