Caveat emptor Wrote:
Dec 07, 2012 6:07 PM
"Yes, they are "deprived of use of the commons" because the land has become "owned" by individuals who have invested labor into it. Even under your scenario of socialist collective, force is used to prevent others from using the commons in ways the collective disagrees with. If the collective builds a factory to produce X, they can use force to prevent others from expropiating the factory for producing Y or Z." Do you even read? I'm not the brightest bulb on town hall, but even I read what other people are saying before I respond. That said. No one other than Conservatives has argued for a socialist collective. What has been argues for is something that exists today. Worker Owned, Controlled and Operated Corporations.