Corbett_ Wrote:
Dec 06, 2012 12:18 PM
I thought it was Iran. At least during the primaries, all of the Republicans were saying that they agreed with everything Ron Paul said on economics and the need to make actual cuts on the federal budget, but that he could not be the nominee because there was a vanishingly slight chance that Iran might someday in the indeterminate future get a bomb. Now suddenly the the people on this site are worried about spending? Seems to me that if they thought spending was an issue, they would have nominated the ONLY candidate who was talking about real cuts to the budget.