If you are sooooooooooooo rational with your defined model which you say is founded on principles which you, yourself cannot define. Other than what you have been told the out come should be. This defines your model as flawed because it is based on flawed data.
Your data is flawed thus you are a blunder.
Your system is flawed thus you and your model are a systematic error.
I see no logic in your arguments or your conclusions. How are they science based?