Torr Wrote:
Dec 02, 2012 11:55 AM
Although the idea of cutting $50 B to allow for spending $75 B sounds like typical liberal/progressive math, why in the hell would any logical person in a Nation that is drowning in it's own massive debt WANT to "increase social expenditures" that are at the root of why we're currently under a mountain of debt? (Liberal/Progressive Collectivists all must be missing the "logic" gene)