Panda Wrote:
Nov 30, 2012 12:05 AM
"those bush tax rates were never supposed to be permanent" Then why are they for lower income levels? The top level received an 11.67% cut from previous levels, while the bottom level received a whopping 33.3% cut from previous levels. But you think only the job-creators on top should lose theirs, while those who benefitted much more get to keep theirs? "Fairness," by liberal standards.