mhughes962 Wrote:
Nov 29, 2012 2:05 PM
thousands of years. And you have the gall and audacity to declare A: its our fault; B: We can do something about it at all; C: Science that agrees with your emotional proclivities trumps Science that does not; D: people who argue with you are stupid depite the history of Science being one of testing and Arguing of hypothesies by people who come to different conclusions based on interpretations of the same data. Your assumptions and the way you handle debate is sad and dangerous, you argue science like RELIGION based on FAITH in your BELEIFS rather than as an academic endevor.