david1833 Wrote:
Nov 18, 2012 4:49 AM
Most of this article is merely semantics, with some light shed regarding the Southern seceesion. The author comes to his point late in the piece, namely that a true secession movement COULD be very bloody. SO he objects to what Ron Paul said because the author hass already considered that the price of libertry is too high. Now would he write a piece onthe price of subservience? We wil pay at least one price and at least one time. In fact, we've been paying th eprice of subservience in installments already