AVCurmudgeon Wrote:
Nov 14, 2012 12:00 PM
As you say, this is about redefining "the core institution of human society." It bespeaks the awesome arrogance of gays that they somehow think this should be done without the consent of society. I have no problem with gays, I have no problem with gay unions, but I do have a problem with society redefining its "core institution" for their benefit. We have the options of civil unions and domestic partnerships, and that should be sufficient to the purpose.