Who can truly say where the "Times" will be in another year or two? No one. But we can observe the particular flavor and color of the rag and deduce that even those who love its content and bias have no intention of paying money to help keep it afloat. You see, those who support what the "Times" is, have the revolutionary mind-set of OWS. For them and their fellow ideological travellers, it's the responsibility of gooberment to take over, print and distribute the paper to anyone who wishes it for "free." Just what's wrong with that? After all, this helps everybody doesn't it?