How about an example or two (fact-based, please) to show just how he was a "scumbag." I love these attacks without substance. This is how liberals argue. It leaves no room for discussion; no exchange of ideas that might enlighten. My guess is that you are regurgitating something you've heard elsewhere and really have no clear idea why Breitbart is so disliked by liberals, except that he disagrees with them on the issues. Of course, in the liberal world, dissent of this sort is not just wrong or ill-informed, but evil and, therefore, not worthy of discussion, just dismissal with character smears and nastiness. You guys think so deeply.