ChuckintheOC Wrote:
Nov 03, 2012 1:55 AM
First, the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) was never well supported by actual empirical evidence, and the computer models that have served the CAGW consensus as replacements for that evidence have failed miserably to predict the empirical evidence gathered in the last few years. The theory is then left without much support by any sort of traditional scientific method, which means it is little more than pseudo-science at best. Second, the CAGW consensus has been shrinking over the years, rather than growing, signaling a theory that is on its way to the dustbin of scientific history, along with a hollow Earth, life on the Moon, panspermia, the Copenhagen Interpretation, Many Worlds, White Holes, Dark Energy, etc.