du2 Wrote:
Nov 01, 2012 1:32 PM
con't: And it would have informed the public, in what way 8's defenders have been lying or using defamation to make their case. And yes, who funded the anti gay campaign IS relevant. Religious bias is most of the impetus behind anti gay sentiment. Churches have violated a lot of laws regarding politicking. Any LEGISLATIVE ground that gay people gained, was vetoed by the governor. It's the rights of gay people to access due process of law. Their grievances ARE legitimate, where YOURS or those who think like you, are not. I'm not making claims, I've followed these gay and lesbian legal precedents for decades now. My family name is ON a CA Constitutional law. Your own bias has made you short on facts, the same mentality that lost the case.