rosalyn3 Wrote:
Oct 24, 2012 5:12 PM
I'm just asking. It seems to me that the incumbent ALWAYS has the advantages...and the responsibility in foreign affairs debates. They have received intel for 4 years that the challenger hasn't. How come this is never mentioned? Then on the other hand, the attack in Benghazi, on anniversary of 9 -11 with big guns was to me a suspected terror attack from day one. I never believed the video thing. I didn't need intel.