p18 Wrote:
Oct 03, 2012 11:58 PM
Because of the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Hard to have the last two if the first is taken away! Or maybe government shouldn't protect innocent life? Here's some twisted logic for ya: when a couple wants to keep the child, they call it a baby. When they want to get rid of it, it magically becomes a blob of cells fit only for disposal. Or this one: the same people who'd risk life and limb to protect unborn sea turtles can't do the same for unborn children. Or how about the whole "viability" argument? Guess that leaves out the younger kids and mabye many of the older ones. For that matter, what about adults that can't exist on their own apart from society? Better ramp up Sanger's eugenics program...