mrz80 Wrote:
Oct 03, 2012 9:49 AM
So because a handful of Republican Presidents did something that any Constitutional scholar would agree goes blatantly against the grain, that justifies the current Democrat in Chief doing the same thing? Funny how something that had everyone all up in arms when Ronnie Raygun or Dubya did it draws a thundering silence when Mister Hope-and-Change does it. What you're really saying is it's okay to flout the rule of law when it's YOUR guy doing it? :-)