dwsmokin Wrote:
Aug 15, 2012 10:44 PM
Good point-except that wasn't the "context" he was working for. It helps in defense of the Romney ad, but we all know the meaning behind. it. What's unfortunate is-"I'll cut govt.spending that's not working". Really? That hasn't been a priority up to now, but will be if you're re-elected? As for the $250K threshold, the implication is that by increasing the tax rate, the economy will start creating jobs. Really? Wow, hadn't thought of that. This guy is really smart.