dwsmokin Wrote:
Aug 14, 2012 12:27 AM
Without the vocabulary lesson, you assume those who approve of ID to-as you say-uselessly go after the fraudulent voter-are thugs as you put it. Why is that? And the "millions" of ID-less Americans that will be "disenfranchised"-curious where that number comes from. Do they not need some form of ID to cash checks, apply for a job, or apply for assistance? Try doing ANY transaction with the Federal government without ID-won't happen. Yet only when it comes to voting are we to take the word of the voter as law. Naive.