jo jo3 Wrote:
Aug 12, 2012 12:07 PM
The fact that he was ifired for not complying proves the intent was sinister. Good for him!!! If the intent was not sinister there would be no reason to fire anyone. They could also have mde adjustments such as was mentioned. I hope they get their butts sued so bad they will not try such a thing again. It would also make quite a statement if his fellow workers stood up for him instead of allowing themselves to be used in this manner. Shame on them.