(cont) And models, as such, can be assessed probabalistically. So it i appropriate for Hansen to apply probabilities in search of conclusions. Whai is not appropriate for Hansen to do is cherry pick the data which he has done. He looked at a sample from the 1950's to the 1980's. Recall, this was a period when science told us we were on the verge of a new ice age. So, compared to then, we are warmer. However, compared to the decade of the 1930's +/- a few years, we are in fact much cooler. Conclusion: Golbal warming is still false and Hansen is a fraud for peddling it.