Grant43 Wrote:
Jul 23, 2012 12:06 PM
Dr. Adams, Clearly you have it all backwards. You would not have been able to make the money had Mike not built the venue. So you owe Mike your money for giving you success. In fact, you should have paid him to allow you to play, not taken money from him. And Mike would not have been successful had it not been for all the people coming in his doors and drinking his booze. So Mike should pay the customers for patronizing his establishment. If we all just follow this brilliant financial model laid out by the President, we would clearly all be better off. Now pay me for reading your article.