dsmith956 Wrote:
Jul 17, 2012 10:24 AM
Actually, the Supreme Court has already OK'd this scheme. Look at Kelo v. City of New London, basically says that a municipality can take away private property for the benefit of another private property owner whose use will generate more revenue for the state. This case was a Souter special, which started a brief movement to try to take away his house to build a bed and breakfast, which would have generated more income. Too bad they didn't go through with that.