shedrick Wrote:
Jul 02, 2012 7:51 AM
This is the most idiotic argument I have ever read. It is not a point in support for reducing unplanned pregnancies, it is an argument in support of the fact that the government controlled adoption process does a poor job in placing innocent infants in loving homes. These children are not born genetically inclined to be criminals you dolt. It is just proof that everything the government controls is run poorly. If you want to control unplanned pregnancies... issue a sin tax under Obamacare. The Supreme Court has already upheld their ability to do so. I think fining people who fail to practice safe sex, instead of rewarding them with healthcare and free support, would seriously reduce the alleged need for abortion.