xjnyc5981 Wrote:
Jun 28, 2012 1:25 PM
There won't be a "rollback." What's the liklihood of taking away a benefit for poor people once it's been enacted? What are they going to suggest in REAL terms -- that those who benefit from this will be tossed out of their plans and once again have no insurance? You can talk about 'liberty and freedom" as a lofty ideal, but when it comes down to implementation and you're leaving the poor without access to health care, who thinks THAT's a good idea or a good platform to run on?