Junk science, activist science, where the conclusion is reached before the gathering of the facts. It is, in fact, a useless argument anyway. One could draw the same conclusion for murderers. Men are many times more likely to commit murder. Therefore, we shouldn't stand in the way of what comes "natural" to them? Genetic predisposition to alcoholism? Let's just grant alcoholics civil rights, maybe even sanctify it in religious ceremony, and call anyone opposed to alcoholism "alcoholophobic". That'll make things better.