ABN-RGR Wrote:
Jun 07, 2012 11:11 AM
There is a distinct difference between intelligence gathering and the use of airspace for travel or incidental photo's taken for purposes other than intelligence and surveillance. The Judge is correct in that this is a deliberate and methodical use of drones for the express purpose of intelligence gathering against US citizens, and that is contrary to our rights as outlined in the Constitution. This issue should be about sovereign property rights, not the so-called "plain view doctrine" used by LEOs. For far too long our property rights have continued to be stripped from us - and don't forget your ultimate property right is to your life.