Donna450 Wrote:
Jun 06, 2012 8:54 AM
The only objection I have to any of this would be that Social Security is taken from the victim of a crime by the government, spent helter skelter, and then has to be taken from another victim. Social security, if it were privatized, would do what it is supposed to do, but it is taken from Victim A, redistributed to whatever cause he government sees fit, and then taken again from Victim B to pay back what was taken from Victim A. We don't have choice, so we pay into a social security and then are told it's not our money.