Don11646 Wrote:
May 05, 2012 9:25 PM
It's always the lesser of two evils. OK, the lesser implies that there is a greater evil. It's clear that O wants to do more to hurt the economy. Mitt (not my first choice) will do the opposite. The lesser evil is also the better of the two. As it stands now, O or Mitt will be Pres and any other choice is impossible, so the lesser is the better - a vote for Mitt does not require total agreement, but that I realize it's O or Mitt, and Mitt is better.