Solipslip Wrote:
Apr 30, 2012 6:18 PM
of course you don't think you statements are contradictions, you though 'em up. Once more: 1) you say she implied that the condoms are a counterpoint to the crosses anti-abortion stance, thus=pro-abortion, g=females can do what they want with their bodies 2) next you say we can't infer any pro-abortion meaning from the condoms 3) lastly,you say perhaps she has pro-abortion proclivities, but we can't infer such from the condoms If you can't see it now, I can;t show you.